The many extracts on these pages are from copyright material. They are owned by the reference given or its owner. They are reproduced here for educational purposes and to stimulate public debate about the provision of health and aged care. I consider this to be "fair use" in the common interest. They should not be reproduced for commercial purposes. The material is selective and I have not included denials and explanations. I am not claiming that the allegations are true. The intention is to show the general thrust of corporate practices as well as the nature and extent of any allegations made. Any comments made are based on the belief that there is some substance at least to so many allegations.

Links to Site Maps

Corporate Practices

to print)

Path to this page
Markets & aging
Nursing homes
The Companies overview

Health care

Hospital Corporatisation
Entry to Privatisation
Privatisation Background
Australian states
Pathology & Radiology
Gen. Pract. Corporatisation

Aged Care

Story of corporatisation
 Nonprofit dilemma
Aging bonanza
Nursing homes
Home Care
Breadth health corporat.
Retirement Villages

Nursing Homes
1985 to 1998
1998 to 2001
2002 to 2005
People farming
Residents & Relatives
The Companies
Not for profit homes

Nursing Hm Comp

The Companies overview

Listed Companies
Audit problem
Ramsay Hlth Care
Retirement Care Aus.

Bigger unlisted Comp.
Moran Hlth Care
Regis Grp

Unlisted Comp. Vic. A
CIS Holdings

Unlisted Comp. Vic. B

SRS & Marnotta
Peel Street
Lasalto & Easyplan etc
Ellis & Elfam
Dampier Bay
Hastings Regional
Navatha & Locksley
Unlisted Comp. Other
Alchera Park
Trans Dominion/Farad
Tolega & Karoona

Introductory page
This corporate web site addresses the issues of corporate health care within a broad framework. A web page describing this broad context should be considered as an introduction to each page on the web site. If you have not yet read it then
CLICK HERE to open it in another tab or web page.

Content of this page
A leading member of the aged care community was a director of a company which was sanctioned in 2004. The release of details about this were delayed.

 Australian section   

Peel Street Management Services Pty Ltd
Mews Aged Care Facility  


This is another single nursing home entity which targeted the luxury market where there were extra payments. The care it provided was anything but, perhaps because the extra money all went to profits. Worse still one of the directors was a prominent person in the sector and on the board of the Aged Care Association in Victoria. Once again there were nursing problems at its Mews Aged Care Facility. It was sanctioned for 6 months.

In a betrayal of their mission and the prospective residents choosing a nursing home the faults in the home were not released publicly for 6 months and only after the sanctions had expired and the home had patched up its services to meet accreditation standards. The 1997 act was used as justification for this. Why reports of similar problems in other homes were released is not explained. We can only speculate whether the involvement of a prominent figure in the sector played a part.

Apr 2004 Top industry official involved

A NURSING home linked to one of Victoria's top industry officials has been slapped with sanctions after residents were found to be at serious risk.

The Mews Aged Care Facility is a top-tier Camberwell nursing home where residents pay a premium for extra services.

Aged Care Association of Victoria board member Greg Gunn is a director of the company that runs the home.

Facilities include an on-site hairdressing salon where residents can make appointments, hotel-type accommodation and meals cooked by a former hotel chef.

The 60-room home's motto is: "Luxury at its best!"

Plush home punished Herald-Sun April 23, 2004

Jun 2004 Cannot be made public!

The Mews Aged Care Facility, a 60-bed high-care nursing home, has until October 9 to meet the standards or lose its accreditation.
An audit by the Department of Aged Care's Standards and Accreditation Agency found there was an "immediate and severe risk to the health, safety or wellbeing of residents".

Under the Aged Care Act (1997), the reasons sanctions have been placed on the home are confidential and cannot be made public.
Restrictions placed on nursing home Progress Leader June 1, 2004

Oct 2004 Released after sanctions lifted

Details of the Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency auditors' findings, made public for the first time last week, have revealed inappropriate wound care, unsafe medication practices, inadequate documentation and an absence of staff training among the concerns.

The last of two Commonwealth Health and Ageing Department sanctions imposed on The Mews Aged Care Facility, a 60-bed high-care nursing home, was lifted on October 9 when the home satisfied all accreditation criteria.
During an agency assessment between April 14 and 21, auditors noted medication had been left unattended on residents' lockers and in one instance, on a resident's wheelchair.

The review also found residents did not always receive appropriate clinical care, with a third of files not containing a full care plan, despite The Mews' policy stating each resident have one within 45 days of admission.
Aged home passes test Progress Leader October 19, 2004

For Updates:- A good way to check for recent developments in aged care is to go to the aged care crisis group's search page and enter the name of the company, nursing home or key words relating to any other matter in the search box. Most significant press reports are flagged there. The aged care crisis web site has recently been restructured and some of the older links used from this site may not work.

top of page 

Web Page History
This page created Sept 2006 by
Michael Wynne